Christian Engström, Pirat

25 mars 2013

Allowing snus in the EU could save 350.000 lives per year

Filed under: English,snus — Christian Engström @ 16:36
Watch my speech in IMCO on how snus could save lives in the EU (6 min)

Watch my speech in IMCO on how snus could save lives in the EU (6 min)

Sweden has by far the lowest rates of people dying from smoking related diseases, compared to the other EU countries. The reason is very simple: we have by far the lowest rates of smoking.

In Sweden, smoking prevalence is 13%, compared to the EU average of 28%. (The second best EU country has a smoking prevalence of 23%, close to the average.) Half as many people smoke, which has led to half as many people dying from smoking in Sweden compared to the rest of the EU.

This is because snus is legal in Sweden (but not in any other EU country), which has given Swedish smokers the possibility to switch from smoking cigarettes to using snus. This represents a major health benefit, because although snus is not a healthy product in itself, snus is between 90 and 99% less dangerous than smoking.

If you are a smoker, the best thing is of course if you can give up all forms of nicotine use completely. But if you are unable or unwilling to do this, switching from cigarettes to snus is almost as good from a health perspective. Thanks to snus, Sweden is a remarkable success story in the fight against tobacco induced death and diseases.

It can often be tricky to compare numbers between different countries, as there can be many different factors that explain any differences in the numbers, but in this particular case it is pretty clear.

Sweden’s two closest neighbours, Denmark and Finland, both have twice the smoking prevalence of Sweden: 26% in Denmark, and 25% in Finland. Both Denmark and Finland are very culturally similar to Sweden, but yet smoking is twice as common there as it is in Sweden.

There simply is no other plausible explanation than snus why Sweden is doing so much better in its efforts to reduce smoking than the rest of Europe, including culturally similar Denmark and Finland.

Smoking kills 700.000 persons per year prematurely, according to the statistics presented by the European Commission. I have no reason to doubt these statistics. Tobacco smoking is the number one preventable cause of death in the developed world.

This means that if we could reduce smoking in the rest of the EU down to Swedish levels, we would save 350.000 lives per year.

Against this background, I find it completely unacceptable that the EU Commission proposes to continue the present ban on snus in all the EU countries except Sweden. With this many lives at stake, it is quite simply immoral that the Commission is not even prepared to let member states who would want to follow Sweden’s example, and use snus as part of a harm reduction strategy, to do so if they want to.

This is, in essence, what I said last week in the Committee for the Internal Market and Consumer Protection IMCO, when we had an exchange of views on the revision of the Tobacco Products Directive.

By lifting the ban on snus on the EU level, and allowing each member state to develop its own policy in this area, we can potentially save hundreds of thousands of lives per year in Europe. Not exploring this possibility is just immoral.

You can watch the video of my intervention on Youtube (6 min).

Read more about how the European Commission is actively massaging and distorting its own scientific evidence to support a continued ban on snus.

With so many lives at stake, we have an obligation to address this matter in a calm and evidence based manner, rather than upholding the EU ban on a smoke-free product that demonstrably saves lives.

…………

Declaration of interest: I am a snus user, which has allowed me to cut down my smoking drastically, even though I have not stopped completely yet. My wife used to smoke, but gave it up completely several years ago by switching to eucalyptus flavoured snus.

11 kommentarer

  1. ”Sweden’s two closest neighbours, Denmark and Finland”.

    Måste fråga, är det något av en yrkessskada att välja bort Norge mentalt?😉

    Kommentar av Sam — 25 mars 2013 @ 19:17

  2. Ja, jag håller med dig i sak men det vore intressant om det fanns siffror på Norge, då snus är tillåtet där eftersom de inte är med i EU.

    Kommentar av Lars-Mohammed Kebabski — 25 mars 2013 @ 20:02

  3. Reblogged this on Urbansundstrom’s Weblog.

    Kommentar av urbansundstrom — 25 mars 2013 @ 21:10

  4. Haha, tänkte faktiskt nämna Norge också😉 Men mycket bra jobb i vilket fall!

    Kommentar av gurra — 25 mars 2013 @ 23:20

  5. @Sam,

    Nej, det är inte en yrkesskada, i det här sammanhanget pratade jag om jämförelser mellan Eu-länder, och då är det bara Danmark och Finland som är våra närmaste grannar.

    Men rent allmänt har du rätt i din reflektion: i Bryssel finns normalt inte Norge med på den mentala kartan, eftersom de inte är medlemmar. Sorgligt, kan man tycka, men så är det.

    Kommentar av Christian Engström — 25 mars 2013 @ 23:30

  6. @Lars-Mohammed Kebabski,

    Det finns undersökningar och siffror från Norge, och de visar precis samma sak som de svenska siffrorna: Snus räddar liv.

    Clive Bates (som är experten som jag lutar mig mycket på) skriver i sin 20-sidiga kritik av kommissionens analys:

    Moreover, several studies from Norway are consistent with the findings from Sweden that snus has, for many years, been the most widely used method for smoking cessation among men. The effects are better for snus than for NRT (Lund et al. 2010, Scheffel et al. 2012). The fact that most snus users in Sweden and Norway are former smokers, shows that snus has long term effects as an informal quit smoking aid (e.g. Ramström et al. 2006, Gilljam et al. 2003, Stenbeck et al. 2009, Lund et al. 2010, 2012)

    (”NRT” betyder Nicotine Replacement Therapy, alltså plåster och tuggummin som säljs som läkemedel.)

    Kommentar av Christian Engström — 25 mars 2013 @ 23:38

  7. […] Allowing snus in the EU could save 350.000 lives per year | Christian Engström, Pirate MEP. […]

    Pingback av Denken over … Allowing snus in the EU could save 350.000 lives per year | Christian Engström, Pirate MEP | Denken over... — 26 mars 2013 @ 17:55

  8. […] Sweden has by far the lowest rates of people dying from smoking related diseases, compared to the other EU countries. The reason is very simple: we have by far the lowest rates of smoking. In Swede…  […]

    Pingback av Allowing snus in the EU could save 350.000 lives per year | Tobacco Harm Reduction | Scoop.it — 27 mars 2013 @ 3:44

  9. […] See on christianengstrom.wordpress.com […]

    Pingback av Allowing snus in the EU could save 350.000 lives per year | vapeforlife — 27 mars 2013 @ 3:44

  10. […] European Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) – also here on his blog.  He is a shadow rapporteur to that committee, and they will provide an opinion to the Parliament […]

    Pingback av Pirate Party MEP tells the truth about smokeless… this is what politics is for « The counterfactual — 29 mars 2013 @ 13:33

  11. I fully support your campaign. I live in the UK and snus was brought to my attention about five years ago by a Swedish work colleague. It was then I found it wasn’t for sale in UK. I have since bought it online. Ironically, a Finnish cancer organisation made this more difficult. Last July I bought an ecig and since then, have hardly smoked. Ecigs are another product whose availabilty the TPD would effectively ban.
    I have posted a comment on Clive Bates blog about the possibility of charging those involved with halting the supply of snus and ecigs with manslaughter (I don’t know what you call this in Sweden – second or third degreee murder?). Would this be a possibility?

    Kommentar av Jonathan Bagley — 29 mars 2013 @ 16:20


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Blogga med WordPress.com.

%d bloggare gillar detta: